<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: php signals while selecting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ammonlauritzen.com/blog/2008/10/27/php-signals-while-selecting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ammonlauritzen.com/blog/2008/10/27/php-signals-while-selecting/</link>
	<description>and still for good reason.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammon</title>
		<link>http://ammonlauritzen.com/blog/2008/10/27/php-signals-while-selecting/comment-page-1/#comment-233547</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ammonlauritzen.com/blog/?p=399#comment-233547</guid>
		<description>I addressed that. The reason the first example does not have an @ is just because I wanted to show the full message. But whether or not that error is logged is irrelevant to the failure in behavior itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I addressed that. The reason the first example does not have an @ is just because I wanted to show the full message. But whether or not that error is logged is irrelevant to the failure in behavior itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://ammonlauritzen.com/blog/2008/10/27/php-signals-while-selecting/comment-page-1/#comment-232600</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ammonlauritzen.com/blog/?p=399#comment-232600</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there also the - mayor - difference, that the example with ticks suppresses errors (using @), the previous one does not?

        $foo = socket_select( $r, $n, $n, NULL );
vs.
        $foo = @socket_select( $r, $n, $n, NULL );</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there also the &#8211; mayor &#8211; difference, that the example with ticks suppresses errors (using @), the previous one does not?</p>
<p>        $foo = socket_select( $r, $n, $n, NULL );<br />
vs.<br />
        $foo = @socket_select( $r, $n, $n, NULL );</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

